ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been msnbc.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



This Sweet 16 as loaded as you'll ever see

Posted: Sunday, March 23, 2008 9:10 PM
Filed Under:

Is this really the Sweet 16?

No Duke. No Georgetown. No UConn. Drake swept the Mo Valley, piled up 28 wins and it won’t play during the NCAA Tournament’s second weekend. Big East tourney champ Pitt, ousted. Vandy sets a school record for wins and can’t even win a game in the Big Dance.

Most of the NBA lottery picks (O.J. Mayo, Michael Beasley, Eric Gordon, Jerryd Bayless, DeAndre Jordan, Blake Griffin) are out. And, take a breath Dickie V, only 1 ACC team remains, just like last season.

And how’s your bracket doing?

But take a second look. (Hyperbole alert!) It’s as loaded of a final 16 you'll ever see.

All the top seeds remain. Four 3 seeds have designs on the Final Four. The always dangerous Spartans and an experienced Washington State team remain. The four darkhorses remaining are two Big East teams and two teams who have combined for 58 wins.

In fact, all 16 of these teams have piled up wins like we’ve never seen before.

Boosted by teams like Memphis (35-1), North Carolina (34-2), UCLA (33-3) and Kansas (33-3), the average record for a Sweet 16 team this season is 29-6. (29.3-5.9 to be more exact.)

That means Xavier (29-6) is simply average. Wazzu (26-8) and West Virginia (26-10) are below the curve. Villanova (22-12) is dragging it way down. (Think about midterms, ‘Cats!)

Look at the South Region. Memphis, Michigan State (27-8), Stanford (28-7) and Texas (30-6) resemble a Final Four lineup, not four teams who just reached the tourney’s second weekend. Their combined record of 120-22 is better than the 2004 Final Four – which featured three 30-win teams.

Nearly half of the remaining teams have already hit 30 wins. Butler won 30 games and is back home in Indy. Such is life with this Sweet 16.

And, while teams simply play more games than ever before – 562 total games by this Sweet 16, 45 more than the 2004 Sweet 16 – they’ve also won at a better rate. A typical team Sweet 16 team in 2008 has played 35 games, and won 29 of ‘em (83 percent). Last year, 34.75 games and 28.5 wins. It was 33 games and 27 wins in 2006; 32.88 games and 26.6 wins in 2005. In 2004 it was 32 games and 25 wins.

It’s not just wins, either. This Sweet 16 features 13 of kenpom.com’s top 20 teams, which is better than any of the previous four tournaments. Teams 1-7 are still playing, while teams that were underrated by polls to start the season (Xavier, West Virginia) are also in residence.

Even Davidson, ranked 29th on kenpom, isn’t your usual tourney Cinderella. Between Stephen Curry’s scoring ability and Jason Richards’ court savvy, the Wildcats figured to be a tough team. (Saying Curry can score is a gross understatement. He now has 100 points in 3 NCAA Tournament appearances, an ppg average that’s only behind only Austin Carr, Bill Bradley, Oscar Robertson, Jerry West and Bob Petit. He oughta make a shooting video ASAP.)

The only aberrations are Villanova (46th) and Western Kentucky (61). But considering opponents for the Wildcats and Hilltoppers were Siena and San Diego were 101 and 113 on kenpom (and both 13 seeds), their inclusions make more sense. Plus, Western Kentucky has won 29 games -- and it's a 12 seed! Talk about loaded.

(They’re unlikely to be playing much longer, though. Kansas and UCLA are huge favorites to win this week.)

Man, I’m breathless. I feel like Dick Vitale laying on the praise for Tyler Hansbrough, bending over backwards to applaud everyone. Basically, I’m staring at those 16 teams remaining and shaking my head at how loaded this week’s games are, not to mention the possibility of an amazing weekend slate.

It’ll overload my synapses. Can’t wait.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

How can you possibly not speak about the Wisconsin Badgers!  Not a lot of glitz but they just always seem to get the job done.  They have looked simply awesome in their wins over Cal Fullerton and Kansas St.  By the way not many of the so called experts gave them much of a chance against K-State and Mr. Beasley!  Talk about Michigan St?  The Badgers won the Big Ten and the Big Ten Tournament taking care of the Spartans.  The Badgers will be there in the elite 8 against Kansas and don't count them out for the final four.  Best coach in the Country and a "blus collar", "Lunch pail" group of guys that don't get rattled and just always seem to get the job done!  It's time they get some respect from media such as yourself.  How you don't even mention them in your article is amazing !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not mentioning Wisconsin HAS to be intentional. The question is why?

Badger,

I think it’s quite obvious.  Wisconsin has had a wonderful season, but unfortunately they will not win another game.  They are about to run into a powerful Louisville team that is not just a good “team”, like Wisconsin, but they also have “real” talent which your Wisconsin team lacks tremendously.
Failing to talk about the Badgers is a perfect example of why they have had such a sensational season ... the national media don't like workmanlike teams, so they ignore them.  The same thing applies to other teams ... they think Wisconsin is nothing but a bunch of big slow guys.  I think Michael Flowers, Trevon Hughes and Jason Bohannon are more than ready to take issue with that!
What do the Memphis Tigers have to do to get any ink in your collumn (good ink that is)?????
I've still got 12 teams in the sweet 16!
Yeah Mike, why don't you talk about all of our favorite teams. I guess if I lived in Milwaulkee, I would want you to talk about Wisconsin too. Thanks for focusing on the teams that matter.
Pretty amazing that you go out of your way to name just about every Sweet 16 team but the Badgers.  Don't you think this article would look foolish if the Badgers advance to the Final Four?  Come on!  4 losses on the season and MSU gets 2 or 3 mentions?  Badger fans are right in complaining that the team gets no respect from teh national media.
Well, at least he DID preface it with a 'Hype' warning, cause it seems the only teams he's interested in are the ones he can ramble on about some pointless glitz. Not much fair weather analyst fodder in those boring teams that shut down their opponents to record low scores. Defense!??? There's no "D" in Basketball! It's all about the celebration of the prima donna innit?
I agree, not even mentioning a 31-4 (5th best record of remaining teams) is just outrageous.  But, it's not surprising if you look back on MSNBC's Big Ten articles.  Half of them focus on Sampson and Indiana, with no headlines of Big Ten conference and tournament champions Wisconsin.  Just keep on ignoring them.  They'll beat Davidson Friday and be in the elite 8.  Then maybe, just maybe, MSNBC will think of them as deserving a singular mention in an article.
Big 10 ACC challenge is such a joke!!!!  The ACC wins it every year, because they often have better raw athletes, but the coaching and the game is so much better on the Big 10 that at the end of the year, the Big 10 stands stronger...
It was about all 16 teams as a whole, not each one. In case you dind't notice, I didn't talk about Tennessee (31-4), either.
I hope no one talks about the Badgers...so none of the teams will plan on getting a game plan on them.  Wisco loves being forgotten.  Let everyone take us on as nobodies.  Till the other teams lose!!!

Go Badgers!!!!
Overlooking Bo Ryan's Badgers and focusing on Michigan State is fine with me as I am an alumni of MSU but I know Wisconsin has the best balanced  team and coach in the Big Ten and will be in the final four! They make ir look soooo easy!
It's nice to not read about a Big Ten team for a change. Jeez they get enough pub already for having such a crappy league. Any league Minnesota finishes sixth in is NOT a good league.
I hope this guy didn't make too much for this worthless article. No mention of the Badgers and this dope is a so-called expert? Another "bench-rider" who never "played" more than the last 10 seconds of a game turned writer. Badgers will hopefully show him for the fool he is because they can sure do it if they play the way they are capable and I think they will.
the reason why wisconsin wasnt mentioned is because they arent good.
You guys sound like  BUNCH OF NEO-CONS AT A HAMMAS RALLY. Put your knee down, put on you thinking cap, and enjoy a great weekend of college basketball (or two) All Mr. Miller is trying to say, what a great tourney!!!
Just a couple of final follow up comments...

Mike, Tennessee has just as much of a right to complain too!  Wow!  Your comeback is that you left out a 4 loss Tennessee team too???  I wish I could get paid for dishing out the swill you are feeding us.  It's not fair to say that it was "about all 16 teams as a whole" and then proceed to name 90% of them.  You should take a hint from the FOX tagline... "fair and balanced".

And as for Joe in Seattle...  If 4 losses does not make a good team, then why aren't your Huskies in the Tournament?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google