ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been NBCSports.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



The greatest programs: No. 5, Duke

Posted: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 11:29 PM
Filed Under:

No matter what your feelings are about the Blue Devils, it’s impossible to ignore their success in every aspect: titles, Final Fours, wins, conference championships, NBA players, etc.

It’s all a huge reason why people love to hate Duke. The Devils are the envy of just about every program. Almost.

Duke may dominate the recent results, but it’s No. 5 on the list of greatest college programs. Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina and UCLA all have more consistent, longer winning traditions or have more championships. Or both.

Before Mike Krzyzewski arrived in 1980, Duke was a good basketball program. Four Final Fours, 10 regular-season conference championships and a national player of the year attest to as much.

It’s Coach K’s tenure that has elevated the Devils to an elite program, which they’re still building on. When he retires, that’s the test for Duke’s standing among the all-time programs.

Still, it’s not like the Devils are going to drop in these rankings anytime soon.

  • Duke’s 1,846 wins are the fourth most all time (100 behind Kansas, 100 more than Syracuse), while it’s win percentage (.6956) is sixth best.
  • The Devils own three NCAA championships (tied with Kansas for 5th), have been to 14 Final Fours (behind just UNC and UCLA) and have the best winning percentage in the Big Dance (.7478). Yes, better than even the Bruins.
  • They’ve been to the NCAAs 32 times and haven’t missed ‘em since 1995, the fourth-longest active streak.
  • Duke’s won 21 regular-season conference titles, won at least 25 games 11 times in the last 15 years (best in the nation) and have had 14 players be named consensus All-Americans 18 times. Art Heyman, Danny Ferry, Christian Laettner, Elton Brand, Shane Battier, Jason Williams and J.J. Redick have all won national player of the year honors.
  • The Devils have been atop the AP rankings for 110 weeks (only UCLA has more) and are the last team to do it for an entire season, in 1992.

And the current dominance? It can be summed up like this: Between ’98 and 2004, Duke was 221-32, (.874) with four final fours and a title. Between ‘86 and ‘94 Duke was 264-59, (.817) with 7 final fours and 2 titles. Take your pick for measuring success. Duke’s done it.

Coach K’s responsible for the biggest highlights, but Duke’s hoops tradition started with Eddie Cameron. His name happens to be on the arena, probably the toughest NCAA venue for opponents to play.

In 14 seasons, Cameron’s Devils won 226 games, claimed Southern Conference championships twice and three tourney titles. Because of that success, the school built their indoor stadium in 1940, which was the largest basketball arena south of Philly’s Palestra.

Duke had more success under Gerry Gerrard in the ‘40s and Harold Bradley in the ‘50s (conference titles were won and there were no losing records), but the occasional .500 mark popped up, while North Carolina and North Carolina State emerged as the region’s national powers. Dick Groat was a sensational player, but he couldn’t do it all for Duke.

That changed in 1959 when Vic Bubas arrived in Durham. He ushered in the first truly great era for the Devils, winning the ACC tournament in 1960, his first season.

More importantly, Bubas recruited Art Heyman, which opened the doors for Duke’s national recruiting. Heyman, with his non-stop motor, is still regarded as one of the Devils’ all-time greats. A ferocious rebounder and determined scorer, the New York native bulled Duke into the national spotlight.

Kick-starting the local rivalry with UNC into a national one helped, too.

Both Duke and UNC were ranked in the top five when they met in the 1961 season. Both had sparkling records and both had designs on the ACC crown. Duke won the game, but it ended with brawl, which served to fan the flames of what’s become sport’s greatest rivalry.

The rivalry has seen other highlights and lowlights through the years, but there’s little doubt both teams’ success and the rivalry’s intensity has only served to raise both program’s profiles. The immediate aftermath of the brawl seemed to have Duke come out on top, though.

The Devils reached three Final Fours in four years from 1963-66, and reaching were in the '64 title game. That’s a run only accomplished only by Kentucky, Cincinnati, Ohio State and San Francisco until then. Yet Bubas was done by ’69, worn out by the job's demands.

That brought on the mediocre seasons. Duke hovered around or below .500 for six seasons until Bill Foster’s 1977-78 squad emerged as a surprise contender and reinvigorated the program.

The Devils lost to Kentucky in the NCAA title game that season, and had a taste of success it never wanted to lose again. When Foster left for South Carolina in 1980, it opened the door for the Coach K. Things haven’t been the same since.

Sure, things started slow (a 17-13 season to begin, followed by two losing seasons didn’t ease the boosters’ concerns), but the Devils were back in the Big Dance by ’84, and by ’85 they finally ended a brutal losing streak to North Carolina.

The next season showcased Coach K’s first great team. That 37-3 squad had a star player (Johnny Dawkins), steady point guard (Tommy Amaker) and solid big men (Mark Alarie, Jay Bilas and Danny Ferry) who won swept the ACC regular-season and tourney titles and came up just short of the school’s first NCAA title.

Since then, Duke has had dominant teams, but that group established the Devils as a perennial contender. It also began a Final Four run not seen since the days of John Wooden’s Bruins.

From 1986 to 1992, Duke played in six of college hoops’ final weekends seven weekendstimes. It was like clockwork: when the Big Dance began, Duke, behind all-around stars like Ferry, would be in the Final Four.

Slowly, the hate began to build. Winning does that. Naysayers talked about the Devils coming up short, especially after losing the 1990 title game to UNLV by a record 30 points.

Then, just like that, Duke silenced everyone. It beat UNLV in the ’91 Final Four – perhaps the most significant win of the last 20 years – and repeated as champs in 1992.

Along the way, the Devils played in one of college basketball’s most memorable games, the ’92 East Regional final against Kentucky, that featured the best finish anyone had ever seen. People hated the Devils even more – especially Laettner – but it didn’t stop their success.

They developed more stars in Bobby Hurley and Grant Hill, and reached another title game in 1994. Coach K was on top of the coaching profession, and rightfully so. This was success in the modern game unlike any program had seen.

The slight dip didn't seem possibly, but maybe it couldn't be helped. How does one stay so good for so long?

In the 1994-95 season, Krzyzewski never recovered from offseason back surgery and was forced to sit out midway through the year. As a result, Duke finished 12-18 and missed the Big Dance. The Duke haters loved it.

It didn’t last, though.

After a season of rebuilding, the Devils grabbed a No. 2 seed in the ’97 tournament, then assumed their place as a No. 1 seed for the next five years. It sparked more talk of Duke bias -- another 1 seed? -- but the Devils’ record reflected just how good they were each season (133-15 from '98 to '01, better than any team in NCAA history).

By 1999, Duke was taking a shot at the greatest single-season anyone had ever seen. People wondered if anyone could anyone beat a 37-1 team with multiple lottery picks on the roster. (The short answer: Yes.)

It didn’t matter. Two years later, Coach K won his third title. The Devils reached the Final Four again in 2004, and have been an annual contender ever since. No more dips, just consistently great teams.

What happens now?

Well, Krzyzewski won his 800th career game last season. He turned 61 in February, which gives him at least another four years of coaching, though he’ll stop whenever he chooses. (He just guided Team USA to a gold medal, so there’s another feature in his cap.) In a few years, he’ll break Bobby Knight’s all-time wins record and, if he wants to, hit 1,000 career victories sometime around 2015.

And he’ll leave Duke cemented as one of the truly great programs in college hoops.

Coming next Tuesday, No. 4 on the list of greatest programs.

No. 6, Indiana.

No. 7, Louisville.

No. 8, Arizona.

 

No. 9, Syracuse.

 

No. 10, Connecticut.

 

No. 11, Cincinnati.

 

No. 12, Utah.

 

No. 13: Villanova.

 

No. 14: Illinois.

 

No. 15: Michigan State.

 

No. 16: Georgetown.

 

No. 17: Arkansas.

 

No. 18: Ohio State.

 

No. 19: St. John's.

 

No. 20: UNLV.

 

No. 21: Texas.

 

No. 22: Notre Dame.

 

No. 23: Temple.

 

No. 24: Oklahoma.

 

No. 25: N.C. State. 

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

They should consider getting a new editor and/or writer.  I've read through this column every day it comes out and it always has horrible grammar and sentence structure.  Example:  "From 1986 to 1992, Duke played in six of college hoops’ final weekend seven weekends"  What?  

Anyway, it's a good column and I enjoy reading it, just thought I'd point that out.
Without ESPN and dookie V
duke would be a good team with success now and then
QUOTE"
Without ESPN and dookie V
duke would be a good team with success now and then

stanley smidd (Sent Sunday, September 14, 2008 8:21 AM)"

Stanley, Dick Vitale and ESPN didn't CAUSE Duke's success.  They didn't make the players better.  They didn't make the shots go in.  Only Duke caused Duke's success.  Many other teams had the same opportunities as Duke (with multiple All-Americans, and great coaches), but weren't able to make it count.  Imagine how it would have been in the late 60s and early 70s (UCLA's dominant years)if there had been ESPN and Dick Vitale.  


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

More Beyond the Arc

Recent Posts:


Archives:


Categories:

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google