ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been NBCSports.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



They stopped Curry! (And lost by 30)

Posted: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 10:13 AM
Filed Under: , ,

During a week loaded with great basketball, who knew a mid-major coach would steal the show?

Just not in a good way.

Jimmy Patsos, the coach of Loyola (Md.) devised a way to prevent Davidson star Stephen Curry from scoring on Tuesday night. Curry, a sharpshooter who came into the game averaging more than 30 points a contest, was double-teamed whenever he was on the court. He took three shots and scored zero points.

“I don’t think irritate is the word. Just confused,” Curry said afterward. “When they’re down by that much and still allowing us to get open shots. It kind of surprised me.”

Curry’s not a moron. He simply took his two defenders into a corner and let his Wildcat teammate play 4 on 3 the entire game. Davidson won, 78-48.

“I know the fans are mad at me, but I had to roll the dice as far as a coach goes. I’m not some rookie coach,” said Patsos, a former longtime assistant at Maryland. “I won a national title as a top assistant coach to Gary Williams. For 13 years I spent on Tobacco Road. I coached a couple of No. 1 picks in the draft. And we scored 48 points. That’s the problem that Loyola basketball had today.”

OK, so Patsos took a chance. But didn’t he ever realize his strategy wasn’t working?

“We had to play against an NBA player tonight,” Patsos explained. “Anybody else ever hold him scoreless? I’m a history major. They’re going to remember that we held him scoreless or we lost by 30?”

Great job, Jimmy. We’ll put you in the Hare Brained Hall of Fame alongside the Bucs letting the Jets score (so they could get the ball back) and Paul Westhead’s defensive strategy with the Nuggets.

This isn’t his first case of bizarre behavior. Last week Patsos watched most of Loyola’s preseason NIT game against Cornell from the stands because he was worried about getting a second technical foul.

"I was trying to turn the other cheek," Patsos told the Baltimore Sun. "In the past, I've been too aggressive. I'm trying to find the middle ground and to be a better person."

For those interested in Patsos’ next move, Loyola plays at Vermont on Nov. 29. Maybe Vermont is a good place for strange behavior.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Sound coaching strategy until it stops working. Then it becomes bad coaching and attention seeking. This guy is clearly an idiot with some type of an agenda. It became very clear at one point that preventing a kid from scoring was more important than winning the game.
THE BEST WAY TO BEAT A TEAM LIKE DAVIDSON IS TO LET STEPH BE STEPH, AND CUT HIM OFF FROM HIS TEAM... BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY ITS A TEAM GAME AND DAVIDSON THE TEAM BEAT LOYOLA
coach is rather weird... u play to win the  game not double team a guy all night take ur chances. have faith in your players
Coach Patsos "strategy" was absolutely ridiculous and detrimental to the college game. I wouldn't necessarily call his tactic "strange" but unfair to the quality of the game! Oklahoma just beat Davidson in a game Curry had about 40 points, without a double team on Curry. Coach Patsos's goal it appears was to make "history" and  receive accolades for keeping Curry scoreless in a 30 point blowout against his team. So exactly what was the point?
This coach clearly had no intentions whatsoever of winning this game!  Nor did he have any confidence in his team...  if I were a part of this program; I really would be thinking to myself “why am I playing for someone that doesn't think I can win?”  His decision was an embarrassment to the Loyola (Md.) basketball program.   Already this season we have seen upsets of top ranked teams from mid-major programs, guys who walked on floor to play a game, to have fun and simply believe they can win!   When it comes down to it...  Coach P, just didn't want to play and He didn't show up to work that night.  I read somewhere that “opportunity favors the prepared mind.”  Coach was not prepared to do his job Nov. 25th.  When it comes down to it, that game was a disgrace to basketball period.  His ego saw it frustrated Davidson and left it on the floor as that and still lost by 30. If you are going to lose by 30, let your kids play the game and learn from that experience, then walk with them knowing you all gave the best effort you could against a great player.  Just PLAY THE GAME!
why was Curry even still in the game with his team up by 30 (it was 68-38) and three minutes left.  The other posters are right on target. Davidson is a good enough when others can take advantage of the double team and have a great night.  He had a better chance of letting Curry do his thing and trying to stop the other 4 guys
Based on comments after the game, and actions during the game, mission accomplished for the coach only.  Press coverage is more important than TEAM wins, why would any recruit or current player want to play for him.  Game Plan versus Vermont:  Send 3 players to guard their top scorer, you made national news with the last non-genius move.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

More Beyond the Arc

Recent Posts:


Archives:


Categories:

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google