ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been NBCSports.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



Cal already contending under Montgomery

Posted: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:30 PM
Filed Under:

It’s amazing what a good coach can do. Just look at the Pac-10.

UCLA (12-2) continues to thrive under Ben Howland. Herb Sendek’s turned Arizona State (12-2) into a Final Four contender. Heck, Craig Robinson’s even made Oregon State (6-6) into a decent team – still not great – and earned plaudits from his brother-in-law.

But Mike Montgomery at Cal has turned the most heads.


Jeff Chiu/AP file
Cal's Jerome Randle

The Bears are 13-2, feature one of the nation’s best offenses and are poised to throw a big wrench into the Pac-10 race. What else would one expect from Monty? He won four regular-season titles and nabbed 12 NCAA tourney appearances in 18 seasons at Stanford.

(Kudes should go to Sporting News’ Mike DeCourcy on this one. He’s said for years that Montgomery was the best coach available and walked into a good situation at Cal.)

Still, some are waiting for the bottom to drop out. After all, Cal was 17-16 last season and lost its best player, Ryan Anderson, to the NBA. Just how good can the Bears really be?

That largely depends on their underrated point guard, Jerome Randle, how long they can maintain their stellar shooting and just how they fare away from home.

First, Randle.

Montgomery’s been elated by Randle’s play, and rightly so. He’s a vastly improved player from last season in every aspect, notably in terms of minutes played and percentage of possessions used. Seems Monty wants the ball in Randle’s hands.

After his 26-point, 10-assist performance during an 81-71 win against Arizona State on Jan. 4, Sendek said Randle was among the nation’s best point guards, likening his play to UNC’s Ty Lawson. That’s pretty high praise, and a little overblown. But not by much.

Randle’s an incredible offensive player (131.7 ORtg, 66.0 eFG% and hits nearly 56 percent of his 3-point attempts), but his ARate lags behind Lawson’s (30.8 to 36.5) and his TORate is far higher (18.0 to 12.4). Still, Randle’s played more than 80 percent of Cal’s minutes this season, which would account for some of the TORate and makes his offensive performance even more impressive.

If the Bears are going to reach the Big Dance, Randle’s going to be the driving force. He’ll need help from back-court mate Patrick Christopher, but Randle’s the guy.

The other factor behind Cal’s start is their team shooting.

Behind Randle and Theo Robertson, the Bears’ eFG% is 55.8, 14th among D-I teams (and third in the Pac-10). That stems from leading the country in 3-point percentage (50.5), though Cal doesn’t hoist a ton of 3s (less than 25 percent of their FG attempts).

Part of that’s from playing 11 of their first 15 games at home, where the Bears have yet to record an eFG% less than 50 percent. That kind of shooting won’t last throughout the season – especially as they face tougher defensive teams. UCLA, USC and this week’s opponents, Washington and Washington State, are among the nation’s top 30 defensive teams.

That leads into the third question mark around Cal: its schedule.

Nine of the Bears’ final 16 games are on the road. Trips to L.A., Seattle and Tempe may be a little painful. After all, they already suffered a 27-point loss at Missouri this season. Will an outing in Pauley Pavilion be any better?

The trick will be to not let the losses steamroll, which is Montgomery’s job. He’ll undoubtedly turn Cal into a Pac-10 power soon enough, but if he can guide Cal to 23 or 24 wins, it may be tough to top his initial season in Berkeley.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I don't follow collegiate b-ball closely, so I was really put-off by all the "inside lingo" used in your article. So what's an "ARate" and a "TORate"? To make your column more accessible to regular sports fans, how about eliminating the "short-hand" and tell us what's so great about Randle's and the Bears' stats? Show us your use of our language not statistical jargon. Thanks. And by the way, it's great to see Cal having a good year w/ their b-ball team. I hope it continues!  
It's not so much "inside lingo" as terms used by Ken Pomeroy on his site, which can found at www.kenpom.com. If you haven't seen his site yet, I encourage you to do so. He includes what each term means, including what role it plays in his analysis.
I've been a Cal fan for a long time, and I haven't seen our team look so disciplined and well-coached since the late, great Pete Newell took us to our only NCAA championship in 1959.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

More Beyond the Arc

Recent Posts:


Archives:


Categories:

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google