ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been NBCSports.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



Hansbrough's legacy tied to this Final Four

Posted: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:29 PM
Filed Under: , ,

The next few days will ultimately determine Tyler Hansbrough’s college basketball legacy.

Accolades aren’t the issue for the North Carolina senior. Few players can match being national and ACC player of the year, a consensus first-team All-American three times (and second-team as a freshman) and the career scoring leader at UNC and in the ACC.

Hansbrough’s been the face of college basketball for nearly three years, as the best player on one of the sport’s most storied programs. He’s led the Heels in scoring and rebounding for four years, the only player to ever do so. UNC’s won nearly 85 percent of its games – 122-22 in the last four years – a mark only a few players in NCAA history can surpass.

"People talk about legends," UNC senior guard Bobby Frasor told the Raleigh News & Observer. "I think [Tyler] is going to have a legend quality about him. The stories are going to build up and build up. People talk about [him eating] sushi now; in 20 years, it's going to be Tyler ate a live cow or something."


Paul Sancya/AP
Tyler Hansbrough

He’ll surely go down as one of the best players of his era, perhaps even of the last decade. But without an NCAA tournament title, will Hansbrough’s legacy be remembered as really good, but not elite?

Does Hansbrough need a trophy to be considered an all-time great?

"His career is bigger than that," Dave Odom, the former coach at Wake Forest and South Carolina, told ESPN before the tournament. "There's always one more thing he can accomplish ... but if [his career ended] today he's one of the greats in all ACC history. He plays every possession as if it was his last and conducted himself as the ultimate student-athlete."

Odom’s view takes into account the larger picture regarding Hansbrough.

Today’s athletes rarely live up to the massive expectations heaped upon them, whether by the media or by fans. It was true of Tim Duncan, a national player of the year who never could take Odom’s Demon Deacons into the Final Four during four stellar seasons.

In that sense, Hansbrough’s already surpassed some of the greats who finished their college careers without winning it all.

Pete Maravich was a scorer nonpareil and three-time All-American, but never even played in the NCA tournament. Wayman Tisdale was a force for Oklahoma in the ‘80s, garnering All-America honors three times, but couldn’t get to a Final Four.

Others dominating players like Jerry West, Elvin Hayes, Wilt Chamberlain and Ralph Sampson all reached the Final Four, but fell short of a title. They’re considered among the game’s all-time greats.

Would Hansbrough ever be considered among their class? Perhaps.

"He stands for what's good about college basketball," North Carolina coach Roy Williams said before the tournament. "He didn't run and take the money. He's good for athletics, period. It's how hard you work and how hard you focus, and that's what he stands for in college basketball. That's why he'll be remembered as one of the greatest players to ever play [in college]."

Of course, Williams may be a little biased. Hansbrough’s a rare breed in today’s game – an star player who stays all four years, stays out of trouble, wins games, all that good stuff.

Still, Williams probably isn’t alone in that regard. People’s reasons for choosing their best player of all-time usually vary, and it doesn’t always include winning a title. These Sports Illustrated writers didn’t pick the best scorer (Maravich) or the guys who won the most (Alcindor, Walton and the rest of John Wooden’s unstoppable Bruins), but focused on other aspects.

Perhaps they were supremely gifted players overwhelming opponents (David Robinson), or got the most out of limited abilities (Chris Mullin) or were simply … cool (Jimmy Walker).

Surely Hansbrough, a player lauded for his unceasing effort and ferocious style down low, would be lauded one day as a great.

If a guy like Oklahoma’s Blake Griffin – the likely No. 1 pick in this year’s NBA draft and the player likely to prevent Hansbrough from winning a second straight national player of the year award – can give Hansbrough some props, how long until opinion sways in favor of the UNC star?

He seems like he never gives up and he's always ready to go," Griffin said. "And just also the consistency he's played with over four years. I don't know how many he's averaged over his career, but obviously if he's the ACC-leading scorer, he's done a great job."

Don’t ask Hansbrough what he thinks of all this. He’s always been a humble star, reluctant to offer sweeping opinions on topics, let alone his place in the game’s history. He hasn’t even thought about life after the NCAA tournament, let alone out of school.

“I’m not gonna let that affect me right now. I’ll think about it in a couple weeks when I’m done,” Hansbrough said this week.

“I guess I’ve prepared myself mentally to leave, but I still think when you’re gone you’re gonna miss the silly things being in the locker and things like that.”

A trickier question: If the Tar Heels do cut down the nets Monday, yet Hansbrough is largely ineffective, what then?

He took just four shots and finished with eight points in Sunday’s showdown with Griffin. If it’s Ty Lawson or Wayne Ellington or another Heel who makes the big plays in Detroit, what then? Will Hansbrough’s legacy be hurt because he wasn’t the driving force behind a championship?

Maybe. But it’s doubtful Hansbrough would care – especially since he’s crucial to Carolina’s success.

If he’s on the court, opposing defenses’ primary concern is stopping Hansbrough. If his presence creates opportunities for teammates, then he’s one of the reasons behind a victory. If he carries the load and the Heels win, even better.

Williams has coached plenty of stars during his 21 seasons, including Paul Pierce, Drew Gooden, Scott May and Kirk Hinrich. But Hansbrough may be better than all of them.

“He’s a unique young man. That’s the best way I can describe him. To me when something is really unique, that means you can’t find many of them. And I don’t think you can find many Tyler Hansbroughs,” Williams said. “I’ve said before, and I’ll say again, I’ve been awfully lucky.”

Perhaps we’re the lucky ones. It’s not every day you get to watch an all-time great.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Here's the thing though: For all the accolades and awards, he's not even the best Big Man Roy Williams has even coached.  I'd personally put Drew Gooden (He set the single season double-double record that Blake Griffin beat this year), Nick Collison (All-American, and always played big in big games.  Witness his 24 and 23 vs. TJ Ford and Texas in 2003 at Allen Fieldhouse to snap a 2 game win streak, his 33 (48% of all the Kansas points!) and 19 vs. Duke in a 69-65 Sweet Sixteen win, and he had 19 and 20 in the National Title Game they almost won that year as well.)  Sean May controlled the paint on both ends of the floor, and was there all they way to a title.  Hansborough is not a great player.  He gets to the line with too much frequency by essentially jumping into people, he doesn't play defense for his size (See Blake Griffin abusing hims last weekend, and before that Bill Self abusing him all last final four with the High-Low).  He's played in an ACC that hasn't had any other marquee big man the last four years.  Guys like Blair, Thabeet, Griffin, Beasley, Oden, Horford, Hibbert, and Noah were all in other conferences.  By no means is he an all-time great, title or not.  You stick his butt playing for someone like Missouri or elsewhere, and he's an absolute nobody.
Hansbrough has been a joy to watch these past four years.  Thanks, Tyler for a job VERY well done!  Go Heels!
He is special in every way. I have enjoyed watching him play. His desire and hustle are unmatached. A quality kid and I'm sure a great teammate.

David he took a team that was not projected to make the tournament to the sweet 16 his freshman year.


Any one that says he is not an all time great is just biased. But so am I. GO HEELS!
Thank you Tyler , You have been such a wonder ! You are what basketball is all about . A talent who is humble, secure and a real role model to a generation of kids . I will hate to see you go.. Let's hope an NBA Championship is also in your future  . How about with the Celtics  !!!  
I saw Hansbrough play Greg Oden in high school at Hinkle Fieldhouse.  Oden's (and Conley's) Lawrence North team won, but Hansbrough was clearly the best player on the court.  You could tell he would be a great one even then.
I'm not all caught up in the Tyler hype, even though I'm from his hometown. I will say he has been a very good player, who will continue to play as a pro if he wants to. I don't understand how people say he won't make it in the pros. Anyone that works as hard as he does will have success. He has been exemplary in his college career. Hard working, stays out of trouble, humble, puts the team first. What more could you want? Yeah, sure, he wants to put the cherry on top by winning the NCAA championship, but his numbers make him one of the BEST college players of all time, even if NC doesn't get the championship. Seems like so many people these days are jealous and just want to tear others down. Even if I'm not caught up in the hometown hype, I'm still rooting for him. You go Tyler!
Hansbrough has been a great player but I wouldn't call him an all-time great.  To be an all-time great you have to do all of the following:

A) Put up big numbers
B) "Lead" your team to a Final Four
C) Dominate your peers

Hansbrough has put up big numbers, but in a conference with relatively weak big men.

Hansbrough also hasn't led his team to the Final Four.  He has played a big part and has participated on great teams.  However, Hansbrough could never single-handidly lead a team to a Final Four. Think Larry Bird, or David Robinson or Carmelo Anthony.  

Hansbrough has been an elite big man in the ACC.  However, the ACC is hardly representative of the country.  If Hansbrough played in the Big East (especially this year) he would be just another big man.  We saw him disappear in the Oklahoma game against Griffin.  "All Time Greats" never disappear.

There are a few exceptions to the above.  You can perform only one or two of the above and still be considered an "all-time" great if you turn out an "all-time" great performance in a huge game. (Think Laettner).  On the flip side, you can cancel your "all-time" status by single-handidly blowing a huge game. (Think Webber).  Hansbrough has done neither.

In order for Hansbrough to be considered an all-time great, he will have to somehow turn out an unbelievable performance in one of the next two games.  He will have to do this in a way that somehow saves his team from a loss.  I don't see this happening.
I have watched Tyler grow into an incredible player over the past four year. His relentlessness is something that us, college basketball fans, will be hard-pressed to ever see again.  Doesn't matter how many times he gets hit, bleeds, and doesn't get foul calls he still is out there with a great attitude making plays. Thanks Tyler for being simply amazing.
One announcer summed up Tyler better than anyone I've heard.  They were talking about back when the only way to catch basketball was live or on the radio.  He said, if this was the case now, and no one ever watched Hansbrough play (just saw his box score), he would be a god.  Everyone just wants to trash Tyler because his game isn't pretty.
Calling him an all time great is a bit much.  However, I think he is a great college basketball player and one hell of a good example (as a person).  He stayed in school, stayed out of trouble and will earn a degree.  I'm an NCSU alum and its hard/impossible to say nice things about UNC, but in Tyler's case, you can't say anything negative about this kid.
What you UNC/Hansbrough haters dont understand is not the fact that he isnt a "great" one on one player.  What Hansbrough has done that others have not is bring it to the court EVERY NIGHT for 4 years.  That is what makes him so amazing.  It isn't his ability to dominate any other player on the court.  If any of you guys have ever really sat back and watched him play, you would see how hard he plays for 40 mins every time out on the court.  That is what makes him standout above other college players.  He has never been known to be the most skilled player on the court.  With that being said, he has made huge strides in his game since his freshman year.  He can now spot up and hit a jumper, he can step out and pull a 3 from time to time, he can finish with players literally dragging him to the ground.  The key to being a strong defender is not about blocking shots, and he has turned into a very strong defender.  He is in the right place at the right time and can cause a headaches to opposing players on the offensive end of the court. This talk of him being one of the best players of all time may be a little farfetched.......but the talk of him not being good and overrated is just silly.  The kids dedication and work ethic is unmatched from anyone I have ever seen on the college scene.  He isnt one of those naturally athletic and skilled players.  He has had to work for his game.  His dedication to working so hard on his game and the ultimate end result is what is so amazing and what puts him in another class from most college basketball players.
I am a Duke fan and I think Dave in New Haven, CT is off his rocker.  Hansbrough has been a stud for four years. If you don't think he would have excelled in the Big East or Big 12, you are not being honest with yourself.  I don't like UNC but still give credit where credit is due.  Blair is a monster, no doubt.  Griffin is an awesome post player.  I think Thabeet is limited, offensively, and overrated for his overall body of work.  Do you really think Thabeet is going to dunk everything in the pros?  Hansbrough has been a stud in a premier conference for 4 years.  He has a better than advertised jump-shot, can handle the ball well, and is a tireless worker.  I don't think he's going to be a great pro but he'll be a solid player in the right system.  A national championship will "validate" him in the media and for the casual fan.  But real hoops fans, who know the game, understand how good he is.
To think Hansbrough is not an all-time great college player is ludicrous. Numbers cannot be disregarded. No one's ever said that he's one of the most athletic guys to ever play, but he has played at a level in one of the most competitive conferences unmatched by few over the years. It's fine to dislike UNC, but saying Hansbrough hasn't created an incredible legacy and put up amazing numbers loses you all credibility.
My personal historic perspective on Tyler and his ranking with the UNC greats.

I was lucky enough to attend Carolina from 1980-1984.  In 1981, we lost the NCAA title game to Indiana, and only got to the game due to amazing play of freshman Sam Perkins.  Sam was the first ever MVP of the ACC tournament as a freshman.  As a soph, Sam was second best player on the team next to James Worthy, and they won Dean Smith's first natinal championship.  As a junior and senior, Sam was second best on the team to Michael Jordan.

I share this because Sam Perkins, in my opinion, was a better college player than Tyler.  Both great, Sam better.  Sam's stats were not as high, but no one under Dean's system of the early 80's would have been higher, especially as a freshman.  And Sam was not as good as Worthy and Jordan at their college best.

So is Tyler great - sure.  A great UNC player.  But on the 1982 championship team, he would have been only the forth best player on our team.
Reading many of the UNC supporters posts I have picked off a few things that you keep repeating about Hansbrough.

1) Work ethic. I'm not disputing Hansbrough's work ethic.  He could be the hardest working player in the history of the game for all I know.  However, work ethic doesn't make you an alltime great.  Is Rudy in the NCAA Football Hall of Fame?  I think not.

2) Numbers.  There's no denying that Hansbrough has put up some great numbers.  However, every single respected college basketball analyst will tell you that the ACC is not the premiere conference when it comes to big men.  Hansbrough has had hardly any competition.  Does that make him bad?  No.  Does that prove that he's an elite big man AMONG HIS PEERS, absolutely not.  I point to Oklahoma where he was clearly outmatched and outplayed by a much better basketball player (Blake Griffin).  This proved to me that Hansbrough, while good, is far from an all time great.

3) Great Character.  Again, if Gandhi played college basketball, I doubt he'd be regarded as an all-time great.  I think it's great that he is a good example.  However, people regard Alonzo Mourning as one of the most charitable basketball players ever in the NBA.  Guess what?  He's not going to the Hall of Fame.  Hansbrough, while a great kid, shouldn't be a considered an all time great because he's a "good sport."

4. Supporting Cast.  Hansbrough has played on a team, that without him, could compete for a National Championship.  He simply is a good player on a great team.  When you think of the all-time great college basketball players, you think of guys that could have led virtually any team deep into the NCAA tournament.  Simply put, Hansbrough is not that guy.

UNC fans will love Hansbrough forever.  His jersey will probably be retired at UNC.  However, when you think of iconic players throughout college basketball history, (Lew Alcindor, Bill Walton, Ralph Samson, Patrick Ewing, Magic Johnson, Pete Maravich, etc) Hansbrough will not be brought up in conversation except among UNC fans and alum.  He's a hard worker, a great guy and a good basketball player.  He is not a legend and hardly among the best of the best.
I'm a little biased being a UNC fan, but to say that Tyler isn't one of the all-time greats is ridiculous.  How many Big East teams could waltz into Cameron Indoor Stadium over the last 4 years and win, and not to mention Tyler did it as a freshman (on Duke's senior night) with a UNC team that lost EVERY starter off of the 2005 championship team.  Needless to say that this years Pittsburgh, UConn, Louisville teams could not even pull off that feat.  We beat this to death, but Tyler's work ethic and determination to win is just rare to find.  Michael Jordan had it when he played, and he is the greatest to ever lace them up.  Tyler's numbers are down some this year, but just look at the improvement of Lawson and Green.  Thank you "Psycho T" for the great 4 years and the whippings you have helped put on Duke (my wife is a Duke fan and it eats her up)!!  Go Heels!!
My first time to see Hansbrough play was against OU and I didn't. He didn't stop Griffen or any body else.
I didn't see him fight for rebounds or be tough down low at all. He looks like a weak sister to me as far as big men go however I will be watching to see if he shows up in these final games.........  
I always think it's funny when a fan can dismiss a player because of his situation ... You don't get to be the all-time leading scorer in one of the nation's premier conferences, which has produced about a billion NBA players, by accident.  It doesn't happen.  Someone just dismissed him for jumping into players to draw fouls and get to the free throw line, as if that was a bad thing.  Doesn't this person realize that's exactly the point of the game?  To score baskets any way you can?  If it was as simple as you describe, wouldn't every player be doing it?
My husband and I have watched Hansbrough play the past 4 years and he has been an absolute pleasure to watch.  One of the greats.  His leadership, team spirit, drive for excellence, intensity and hustle make him an all-time great college player.  Someone above said it right - he HAS brought it, every game.  He exemplifies what college sports should be about - TEAM - not star quality.  He's the kind of guy, like Tim Tebow, who's going to excel in life no matter what he does.  He has that quality about him, on and off the court.  A class act.

Thanks, Tyler, for a fantastic four years - we'll miss watching you play in Carolina blue.  GO HEELS!  
Tyler is great but watch Saturday vs Nova.  Foul trouble quick.  Size thrills, speed kills.  Nova outright.
If he's not one of the best how did he managae player of the year and all american 4 yrs in a row. As for Thabeet when was the last time he produced significantly against a domanant center, certainly not against Pitt or even georgetown 4 points and 8. Griffin is definitly a match for anyone. Give the guy credit he's done whats others dream of!
I love all these U Conn. people with comments about Tyler. Who ever heard of U Conn 10 years Ago?? ACC basketball has been King since the aerly 60's and before that it was the MVC. These U Conn people weren't even born. Open your history books boys, Hansbrough has set the ALL TIME RECORD for free throws and that includes Rick Berry. Know what you are talking about U Conn because once your coach retires, you will be a foot note in College basketball
He has been an exceptional college athlete, regardless of the outcome this year. I have never seen him give less than a total committment and effort for even an instant. In the face of truly hateful criticism by adults and students alike, he has never failed to continue to be respectful and has never raised his voice to protest his treatment. What more could you ask for?
He doesn't referee, he doesn't determine the content on ESPN, he doesn't pick the All-America teams... yet this young man is absolutely reviled.
Will he be a great pro? Who knows, including the truly obsessed haters?
I'm no UNC fan, but I'll be rooting for them this weekend, just to spite the irrational rabid foaming at the mouth haters.  
uh Jeff, his name was Rick Barry... speaking of knowing what you're talking about...
I'm sorry Blake Griffin absolutely abused and exposed Mr. Hansbrough and anyone who says different suffers from low basketball standards. Hansbrough has enjoy the pure luck of playing in the ACC which hasn't  had not one top big man in the last four years. Yes I tip my hat to him for working hard and his numbers speak for itself. But I hope Mr. Hansbrough or his fans haven't invested any of their time in the hype that has been thrown his way because the thumping that Mr. Griffin handed out to him is just a small taste of what awaits him when and if he goes to the next level.  All time great player....... No way.
Tyler reminds me of dave Cowens.  Cowens could shut down Lew Alcindor and Dave was 6 foot 8" tall.
Go get 'em Psycho T! and best wishes as a pro!
DR
Tyler Hansbrough will and should be remembered as an all time college great. Personally, I'm a UK fan, so it's hard for me to give such accolades to a North Carolina player, but he deserves it. To be the all time leader in points and rebounds at a school like UNC, and all time scorer in a conference with as much history as the ACC shows what type of player he is...ALthough we can't know him personally, he also seems like one of the "good guys" you want to root for-guys who go to class and don't get in trouble. Thanks Tyler for giving it everything you had on the court and being a joy to watch, good luck in the Final Four and in Life.
Evan,

You couldn't be more wrong!

Hansbrough is a great player on a great team.  How else can you explain the fact that he is the ONLY player in ACC history to lead his team in scoring and rebounding for four years?  Yes, UNC is a great team and could contend for a title without him.  Yet he continues to lead the team in these major categories.  

Was he outmatched in the OK game?  He was in foul trouble and sat for some time, and for the most part wasn't covering Griffin.  However, when he was covering Griffin, Griffin did not score.  Edge...Hansbrough.


As for your list of all-time great centers, you lost all credibility when you added Ralph Sampson.  He was clearly not good enough to win ANY championships with UVA, NCAA nor ACC.  So, why is he included on your list?  He only made it to one final four (where UVA was, ironically, beaten by North Carolina) and like Hansbrough, had an excellent supporting cast.  So, what makes him so great and Tyler not so great?

When it's all said and done and the dust settles, Tyler Hansbrough's jersey WILL be retired, and hang in the Dean Dome, and he will be one of the GREATEST to ever play at one of the most heralded schools in NCAA basketball history.  If that doesn't make him one of the greatest ever, nothing will.
Tyler in the history of college b-ball will probably only be rememebered as the hardest working, leave everything out on the court, player in college history. Tyler is the kind of player every coach wants on his team. To be included as a great at UNC is to be among the greats of college basketball
I've watched Hansbrough for 4 years now.  People who are just now watching him have missed a lot.  His Freshman and Sophomore years he was the focus of the team.  Then last year as Lawson and Ellington improved UNC's entire offense changed.  And it's been even more so this year.  The team is so talented this year that Hansbrough is just one option, not THE option.  It's amazing he's kept his scoring up despite that.  

I find the comments based on the OU game amusing.  If OU had actually showed up to play, you would have seen Hansbrough score more.  I think Lawson and Hansbrough both could have missed that game and still beaten OU.  Just look at Hansbrough's shooting % in the game.  If UNC wasn't scoring at will with everyone else, they would have gotten him the ball more.
First off, some corrections afoot: TH's team didn't make the Sweet 16 as freshmen; they lost to George Mason in the 2nd round.  Also, for all the stat worship on here.  Hansborough scores alot of points.  He does that much from the free throw line (He set the all time NCAA record for both attempts and makes as a junior: He made more in three years than any player in history had in four!).  He also ends up with more possessions with which to score, as he plays in a speed it up system.  19 points in a 90 point game isn't as good as 15 in a 60 point one, for example.  The other problem is that he simply does not play defense.  He can't block shots or challenge his man.  He tries to draw fouls and that's it.  That's one reason that quality big men, such as Blake Griffin or Kansas' fourheaded monster last year, eat him alive. His game, much like Harangody's, translates well to stats but not to substance (which is rather ironic since he seems to be the "hard working Captain Intangible").As an "All time scorer" he also benefits simply from the fact that he plays alot more games now as the schedule has lengthened.  Players now play 40 games a year if they go deep in the tourney; Bob Knight's undefeated 1976 team went 32-0.  Last year's NCAA Champion lost 3 games, but still won 5 more than Knight's did.  

As to conference comparisons, I was making a point.  The only nationally great big man he's gone up against in the ACC was Sheldon Williams his freshman year.  In that time, other conferences have had other good big men.  Of the various All-American teams for 2007-2009, no other ACC Forward or Center can be found.  While he's beated Duke in Cameron, those Duke teams in recent years have been bounced in the First Round, Second Round, and then humiliated in the Sweet 16.  It's not like he beat up on Shane Battier, Elton Brand, Danny Ferry, Grant Hill or Christian Laettner there.  

Also, seriously, not a UConn fan but calling them out for being a one coach product?  When Deano left, after the Guthridge interregnum, you guys were nothing until you pulled a Kentucipari and went off to buy a coach who'd proven himself elsewhere.  Pot, meet kettle.


Ditto for how "hard" he plays.  Saw him in the national semifinal last year.  When it got close in the end, as Kansas started to go on a final run to pull away, I noticed where the hard worker was: on the floor, on the offensive end, trying to draw a foul.  The rest of his team, and Kansas's was hustling back.  Kansas got 5 on 4 and made a bucket to keep pulling away.  "Playing hard" means playing defense.  Hansborough should learn some.
He's over rated, and we will see what happens the NBA which is at a very different talent level. We have heard of all the Carolina overated such as Giminsky,Hurley, and all the other Carolina and Duke boys that wasn't cut for the NBA. Tyler will be okay, but all the hype will dye down when he faces the Kobe Byrant,Dwight Howards,Lebron James,Paul Gasol, Lamar Odom, Shaquille Oneal,Tim Ducan. It's only colleg hype and nothing more of him. Bladen is the best in college hands down, Tyler will not win a college championship.
Sadiq, you are just a few hours from looking really ridiculous regarding your prediction that Tyler will not win a championship.

By the way, for all of you who think Tyler can't play big against a big opponent under pressure, may I remind of you of the Louisville regional finals in Charlotte last year. Tyler decimated Louisville's front line.

One of the greatest performances I have ever seen.
Basketball is no longer a sport; Bird and Magic turned it into entertainment 30 years ago.  Tyler isn't an entertainer. But, taking into account all his awards and records, he certainly deserves to be listed as one of NCAA's all time best players.
I can understand why some people don't fully appreciate why Tyler Hansbrough is one of the greats.  I'm not sure you can just watch him in one or two games and really understand what he brings to the game.  And if you've only paid attention to him the last couple of years, you really missed a lot.  Prior to Lawson elevating his game last year, UNC revolved around Hansbrough right from the start of his Freshman year.  And perhaps that's what speaks most about him.  Once it was clear he was not the ONLY real option, he didn't sulk, complain, leave for the NBA, some of the things a lot of players of his stature might have done.  He was the national player of the year last year, but it was clear from the start of this season that the offense was going to rely a lot more on the backcourt play. But he never let up or seemed to be bothered by not getting as many opportunities to score.  He was just interested in winning.

He's a talented player.  I don't expect him to be a superstar in the NBA, maybe he will with his work ethic and competitive spirit, but I don't care.  That's been true for a lot of college stars.  But at this level, he's in elite company and for good reason.  God Bless Tyler Hansbrough.  As a long time 'Heel fan, I've enjoyed watching him more than any player I can recall.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

More Beyond the Arc

Recent Posts:


Archives:


Categories:

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google