ABOUT THIS BLOG

News, analysis, feature stories, random thoughts... if it's about college basketball, either in season or during the summer doldrums, you'll find it in Beyond the Arc.

Mike Miller

Mike Miller has been NBCSports.com's college basketball editor since 2003. It's a position he relishes; no wonder considering he transferred to Kansas to watch Paul Pierce play. Most of his favorite sports memories involve college hoops, usually during March, when every waking moment is spent thinking about March Madness.



Member schools, the NCAA feels your pain

Posted: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:09 PM
Filed Under:

In an economy like this, every little bit helps. Little being the key word.

The NCAA announced Wednesday that it’ll suspend membership dues for next year, and also plans to distribute about $5 million to schools.

But … there are about 1,000 member schools. And dues are only $900 to $1,800, depending on which division you play in. So that’s about $6.3 million to divvy up, which works out to $6,300 per school.

“There's a multi-pronged approach to help schools and these are the beginning steps in a plan to relieve some of the financial pressure,” NCAA spokesman Erik Christianson told the AP. “Our members believe every bit helps.”

Little bit is right. $6,300 is barely enough to pay off the average credit card debt of two college students, let alone boost an athletic department’s budget. It’s barely a blip on the revenue for most D-I schools. Maybe they can buy a Yugo or splurge on lottery tickets.

Check out this list of D-I budgets and revenue (thanks BBState.com). Savannah State’s 2008 revenues were $2,222,989. Its expenses were $2,102,031. And it’s 340th among all D-I schools. It can’t even come close to spending money like the top D-I schools.

Revenues from Texas ($120,288,368), Ohio State ($117,953,712) and Florida ($106,030,896) all topped $100 million. The Longhorns and Buckeyes both made about $20 million last year.

OK, so it’ll give Cal some breathing room. The Bears made $746 last year.

If BBState’s figures are correct, no school lost money last year (a far cry from English League soccer). Heck, 191 schools on the list spent every penny, and not a dime more. (Hmmmm.) It makes me wonder if some numbers have been fudged, but if those are correct, then maybe the money isn’t necessary.

Wouldn’t the money be better spent on establishing an endowment for student athlete scholarships? Or improving facilities? Or creating more jobs for graduates within the NCAA? (Anything to bolster the economy.)

Then again, distribute the money. They can have a party with this bottle of bubbly.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

I'm not 100% certain on this, but I seem to recall that the revenue figures colleges report for their athletic programs include any money they transfer from their general operating budgets to balance the books.  So everyone shows a net positive number--but it's not necessarily a net profit from operating the sports program.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

More Beyond the Arc

Recent Posts:


Archives:


Categories:

Syndicate This Site

Add Beyond the Arc to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google