<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx</link><description>Once upon a time, Connecticut hoops had a nice, cozy existence as a regional powerhouse. 

Between 1947 and 1967, the Huskies won 17 Yankee Conference regular-season titles and reached the NCAA tournament 11 times. Sure, they only won one game in the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60608.1)</generator><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1249296</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:15:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1249296</guid><dc:creator>grokamok, the Internet</dc:creator><description>OK, I retract anything I might have said about leaving Michigan out - the scandals undid nearly all of their best stuff after the national championship in 1989 and their overall record, especially absent those years, doesn't quite measure up -- they might have been in the HM/ORV category. &amp;nbsp;We'll see Arizona, Syracuse and Louisville before you get to the &amp;quot;big six&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On to UConn - despite its great success under Calhoun, the number-padding (wins, conference titles, NCAA appearances) while in the Yankee Conference is what really skews this placement - their paucity of post-season tournament victories (something like 4 in 13 appearances prior to &amp;nbsp;the Big East) or players of note in that era stands as testament. &amp;nbsp;Would I put them ahead of Villanova? &amp;nbsp;Maybe (OK, probably), but as I said before, 'Nova was over-ranked at 13; UConn is over-ranked here, too. </description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1249378</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:36:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1249378</guid><dc:creator>Adam, Louisville</dc:creator><description>You knew I would catch an error if it was about Louisville Mike. &amp;nbsp;Louisville has won with a percentage of .652 (more than Uconn's .638).</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1249388</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:59:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1249388</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy , NYC</dc:creator><description>spoken like a true hoya fan grokamok</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1249874</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:36:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1249874</guid><dc:creator>Mike Miller</dc:creator><description>Ahhhhh! Adam, good catch. That won't affect Louisville's overall ranking, but man, that was a stupid error.</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1250126</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:43:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1250126</guid><dc:creator>Adam, Louisville</dc:creator><description>Mike, you are trying to pull stats out of places we've never been. &amp;nbsp;Small mistakes are inevitable and you are compiling this all based on the same criteria. &amp;nbsp;I love that you are tackling this project. &amp;nbsp;Maybe if you have the formulas all set up it wont take as much to compile the list and you could put it out annually just as list so we could see the changes if any. &amp;nbsp;</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1250212</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:06:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1250212</guid><dc:creator>Steve firth, Haledon, NJ</dc:creator><description>One error in your story is the number of wins UConn had in the NCAA Tournament from 1947-1967. &amp;nbsp;In 1964 under coach Fred Shabel, UConn made it to the regionals with wins over St. Joseph's and Bill Bradley's Princeton team before getting overwhelmed by Duke.</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1251385</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:59:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1251385</guid><dc:creator>grokamok, the Internet</dc:creator><description>@Jimmy - happy to be one!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that I did not say that UConn should be ranked below Georgetown, just that they are ranked too highly here. &amp;nbsp;If I were commenting just to be a homer, I'd be complaining that the Hoyas are not the top BE team in the list; as it is, I would only put them ahead of 'Nova and Illinois (but still behind UConn and Michigan State -- for the time being...).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such subjective differences are the nature of these lists - it would be no fun without them!</description></item><item><title>The greatest programs: No. 10, Connecticut</title><link>http://beyondthearc.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/08/05/1249132.aspx#1257317</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:11:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8a5d2dbc-a0e4-4c7a-979f-3188051f228e:1257317</guid><dc:creator>Don</dc:creator><description>NOTRE DAME in the top 25, yet even in the top 100 is a joke! &amp;nbsp;ND basketball is not worth watching at ANY time.&lt;br&gt;Ridiculous</description></item></channel></rss>